"The Apology of Socrates" and how it relates to the age old "Golden Rule":

Brett Walter HUM 205 Paper # 5 The Apology of Socrates and how it relates to the develop former(a) Golden Rule:         What ar uprightness and justice? bathroom truth and justice accurately be determined or considered in a sequel of law without first examining the rigor of the judiciary structure and entity of the net judging authority? whatsoever individual can be deemed guilty or not, at any(prenominal) beat, for any tell crime , but the square invoice of ones guilt or white is only as valid as the court structure to which it is subject, and in the long run, the true measure of guilt or innocence is determined only by the one who is standing accused. The relevance, if any, regarding the crimes and how they consent with that individuals values volition ultimately determine their guilt or innocence regardless of what any jurys verdict or judges censure may be. What Im referring to is the individual conscience. No matter what the scenario or judg ment of conviction period, be it 30 age ago or 2400 years ago, the human conscience that resides in each of us will provide the necessary truth and justice we seek as individuals.

The charges that were brought against Socrates were not criminal in nature, they alleged that he move injustices by investigating the things nether the earth along with heavenly things; that he made the weaker lecture the stronger; and that he taught others to do the same. When considering whether Socrates was exculpated or guilty of the crimes with which he was charged, bear in beware the social standards of Athens during the time of his trial, the legitima cy of his accusers and the validity of the a! cts he allegedly committed. One of the charges brought against Socrates was blasphemy. He was accused by his peers of being a sacrilegious... If you want to bring on a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay